On our page entitled "There is a Need for a Higher
Standard in Fall Protection" it is stated that a review of the OSHA
regulations governing fall protection shows that in 29 CFR 1926.502(d)
"If a personal fall arrest system is used for
fall protection, it must do the following:....Limit maximum arresting
force on an employee to 1,800 pounds (8 kiloNewtons) when used with a
body harness; Be rigged so that an employee can neither free fall more
than 6 feet nor contact any lower level".
This is where the Catch-22 exists. The harnesses that
are being used on the market today cannot meet this standard. The present
harnesses allow a fall distance of nine and a half feet. That is a six
foot lanyard plus the three and a half foot "elongation
deceleration device" or the EDD. The EDD is a package approximately 6
inches long, which contains three and half feet of folded lanyard. It is
portrayed as an additional safety device in the event of a fall. In
actuality this elongation deceleration device, which will
expand in the event of a fall, allows the user to fall an additional
three a half foot over and above the six foot length of the lanyard. In
order for a harness in use today to meet the standard, using an
elongation device, it would have to be wrapped three and a half feet
around the structure the user is attached to, to lessen the entire length
of the lanyard to within six feet if a fall occurs.
The situation produced in this scenario is that workers
are provided with a harness with a six foot lanyard which includes an
elongation device of an additional three and a half feet. In the event of
a fall the elongation device is going to expand and the
worker will fall nine and a half feet. Since buildings are
built in ten foot increments you are going to contact a lower level.
Therefore, the harnesses being used today are not within compliance.
You, as the worker, should see this from the worker’s
perspective. There is a major gap presented here. What is written on
paper and what actually works in the field are two different things. A
worker either uses the harness with the working room needed to complete
the job and at the same time is out of compliance, or he ties off with no
working room and loses his job when he cannot perform his task quickly
and efficiently. If he attempts to lessen the length of the harness to be
in compliance, he is reducing himself to a working distance of two and a
half feet or less. That in effect is a positioning harness and does not
allow the movement necessary to get the job done. The worker is caught in
a Catch-22. No one is going to do this. These men are there to feed their
family and they would much rather take the risk of a fall than to lose
their job. So he wears the harness and should a fall occur he is not
protected from contacting the structure he is tied off to and in many
cases these falls result in major injury and sometimes death. At the same
time the worker is found to not be in compliance and any hope of
financial restitution is eliminated.